they have constructed thier “model” and are trying their best to find a scrap of evidence to support it..
anything to avoid facing the “concept” of a CREATOR will do
By revealed truth and definition, our Creator must be supernatural, while by definition natural-science only deals with natural explanations for natural processes.
So, if a scientist were to say, for example, "God did it", then he would not be speaking science, but rather his own personal religious beliefs.
Both panspermia and abiogenesis are valid scientific hypotheses, though neither is strongly confirmed, both are equally likely, or unlikely, to be part of God's great plan for His Universe.