Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: canuck_conservative

I am not at all certain about the facts. What were the actual observations and by whom, and under what circumstances that support the assertion that 11 of 12 balls were “significantly” underinflated?

Since the “officials” corrected the situation at half time, no more physical evidence exists to definitively establish the facts. (It’s as if a CSI team had gone in and cleaned up the crime scene, without taking any samples or photographs, and then went into court and testified that there was blood all over the place.) Still, if the officials had corrected the situation at half time, why was the ball taken out of play prior to the first snap of the second half?

I’ve heard all the innuendo, I just don’t know what the evidence is.


20 posted on 01/23/2015 8:53:35 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“I am not at all certain about the facts. What were the actual observations and by whom, and under what circumstances that support the assertion that 11 of 12 balls were “significantly” underinflated?

Since the “officials” corrected the situation at half time,


Don’t post as fact when you are not at all certain about the facts.

Lead with ‘IF’.


26 posted on 01/23/2015 9:05:43 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

The officials have the original 12 balls. In the 2nd half they substituted in back-up balls that met specification. Supposedly the NFL has all the balls that were used by both clubs.


39 posted on 01/23/2015 9:26:50 AM PST by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson