Is a government really obliged to finance art in this way? I think freedom of expression doesn't mean one's expression should be financed with public money.
To: Freelance Warrior
2 posted on
01/14/2015 1:39:54 AM PST by
PGalt
To: Freelance Warrior
Russian governments have long supported the arts, to a degree that Americans cannot imagine. It all goes back to their Communist past.
4 posted on
01/14/2015 2:33:46 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: Freelance Warrior
“He said: ‘Let all the flowers grow, but we will only water the ones we like.’ Sounds exactly life Affirmative Action, Racial Double Standards, Corrupt Court Decisions, and Holder's "Just Us" Department in action.
5 posted on
01/14/2015 2:38:48 AM PST by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: Freelance Warrior
Government help, without which art cannot function, should be equally spread between all participants.”Let those who enjoy "art" PAY for the "art" that they enjoy. Something no one wants to pay for is the very definition of useless.
16 posted on
01/14/2015 7:27:23 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson