Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LifeSiteNews uncovers NARAL’s 7-point plan to destroy crisis pregnancy centers
LIFE SITE NWS ^ | Jan 13, 2015 | Ben Johnson

Posted on 01/13/2015 5:41:16 PM PST by Morgana

Documents obtained by LifeSiteNews.com uncover a disturbing pattern of public officials colluding with NARAL to hinder the efforts of pro-life pregnancy care centers. But the greatest find is on pages 5-7 of the exchange: A two-page document, on official letterhead, revealing NARAL's seven-point plan to harass CPCs.

LifeSiteNews filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with Montgomery County, Maryland, to obtain the e-mails, which can be read in their entirety here.

At the time, county officials were locked in a legal battle with Centro Tepeyac Silver Spring Women's Center, which they had targeted with an ordinance forcing the pro-life facility to post signs designed to discourage women from using its (free) services. The legal case was open-and-shut – so much so that a Clinton-appointed federal judge fined the county $375,000 for violating the center's free speech rights.

As council members were deciding their next steps, e-mails show that they danced to the tune of the abortion lobby. NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland suggested dropping the court case – which Centro had won – and instead implementing seven other measures to harass its pro-life competition.

“NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland strongly suggests that the council consider the following options instead of moving forward with further litigation,” Jodi Finkelstein, the NARAL chapter's president, wrote in an e-mail to then-council president Craig Rice. (All emphases in original unless otherwise noted.) She added that "[r]esources will be better used exploring and implementing the options listed below."

The seven steps included:

* “Prosecute centers for consumer protection violations,” such as allegedly practicing medicine without a license.

* Deny pro-life women's centers free speech by banning any ads that violate “truth in advertising” – as defined by Democratic politicians and the abortion lobby, naturally. Finkelstein said she had “a great example of this from San Francisco.”

* Deprive pregnant women of the ability to get a free ultrasound by not referring them to pregnancy centers. At a minimum, NARAL recommends the county “list their ideological position” and their “limitations,” like the fact that they do not perform abortions.

* “Deny funding to CPCs.” Finkelstein offered, “We are happy to provide a copy of legislation from a county in another state that created this requirement.”

* Have the county engage in a “public awareness campaign” – a publicly financed propaganda effort against pro-life centers. NARAL believes this “would be an effective educational tool” for the county's women. Advertisement

* Create a private right of action for women who say they were “harmed” by CPCs, allowing them to sue. “NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland suggests first trying to prevent such harm from occurring.”

* “The FDA has clear regulations regarding ultrasounds that are not currently enforced.”

“I would be happy to meet with all of you discuss [sic] the options listed in further detail,” Finkelstein volunteered.

A list of this sort is not produced by a local or state affiliate. It draws on the counsel and experience of the national organization. It would seem fair to say this document embodies NARAL's national strategy for combating CPCs in every city and county across the United States.

The documents show that public officials immediately acted upon their specific suggestions. (Read the full story here.)

The e-mails betray politicians walking in lockstep with Big Abortion's lobbyists. “It is our hope that the Montgomery County Council (Council) will once again partner with us to ensure Montgomery Council citizens are aware of the misleading tactics used by crisis pregnancy centers,” Finkelstein wrote, while thanking the council for its “passionate defense of reproductive health.” (Emphasis added.)

They show the chummy relationship between liberal politicians and their constituency groups, as the principals discuss meeting at friends' homes and opportunities to attend pro-abortion events.

Bill Allison, a senior fellow at the Sunlight Foundation, told LifeSiteNews, “If government officials are using outsiders to make decisions and policies – giving them access to and influence, and allowing them to impact decisions that effect the public – the public should know about it.” But no one in Silver Spring seemed interested in telling the public that council had outsourced its abortion policy to NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland.

The communications also display NARAL's blatant hypocrisy. Finkelstein demands that FDA regulations be used for ultrasounds. The FDA also has a clear protocol for the use of RU-486, which is not currently enforced – a fact NARAL's allies have sued to assure. Never mind that eight women have died from sepsis after off-label use of the drugs. Flouting the law gives abortionists an extra $200 profit per abortion.

Ironically, this story is breaking just days after NARAL sued the state of Ohio for all communications with Ohio Right to Life, expressing its civic-minded concern that Ohio RTL exerts “improper” influence over the state's public servants.

Maybe NARAL was just thinking about what it would do if it were in the same position.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Whatever NARAL does with its national campaign to shutter and silence women-centered pro-life activity, its plan is now available for all to see thanks to the investigative journalism of LifeSiteNews.com. We wish to thank Matt Bowman of ADF for fighting NARAL's legal tactics in the Centro case.

And thank you, our readers. Your support – through prayers, sharing our stories, and donating to our cause – helps make exposes like this possible.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; abortion; crisispregnancy; emails; freedomofspeech; freespeech; jodifinkelstein; maryland; naral; prolife; ultrasounds

1 posted on 01/13/2015 5:41:16 PM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Maryland ping


2 posted on 01/13/2015 5:43:48 PM PST by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Ironically, this story is breaking just days after NARAL sued the state of Ohio for all communications with Ohio Right to Life, expressing its civic-minded concern that Ohio RTL exerts “improper” influence over the state's public servants.

"One tried-and-true tactic of the left is to always accuse the enemy of the very same crimes they themselves are committing."

Source.

3 posted on 01/13/2015 5:53:36 PM PST by Steely Tom (Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

racketeering and slander/libel issues here. collusion. conspiracy.

legal action on national scale.


4 posted on 01/13/2015 5:56:47 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Interesting -
I believe I’ll print this off and pass it out tomorrow night at my Hibernians meeting, which is about 4 blocks from there


5 posted on 01/13/2015 5:58:52 PM PST by AbnSarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
“NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland strongly suggests that the council consider the following options instead of moving forward with further litigation,” Jodi Finkelstein, the NARAL chapter's president, wrote in an e-mail to then-council president Craig Rice. (All emphases in original unless otherwise noted.) She added that "[r]esources will be better used exploring and implementing the options listed below."

The seven steps included:

* “Prosecute centers for consumer protection violations,” such as allegedly practicing medicine without a license.

There is no money exchanged between the CPC and the women.

* Deny pro-life women's centers free speech by banning any ads that violate “truth in advertising” – as defined by Democratic politicians and the abortion lobby, naturally. Finkelstein said she had “a great example of this from San Francisco.”

Huh, deny free speech? With an ad that says "Free Pregnancy Test"

* Deprive pregnant women of the ability to get a free ultrasound by not referring them to pregnancy centers. At a minimum, NARAL recommends the county “list their ideological position” and their “limitations,” like the fact that they do not perform abortions.

CPCs are informational. The pamphlets and the ultrasound are the points of information. The only diagnosing done is a free pregnancy test, the very same one a women could buy at a drug store. The women see pictures and videos and read they read information. Can't have that.

* “Deny funding to CPCs.” Finkelstein offered, “We are happy to provide a copy of legislation from a county in another state that created this requirement.”

Deny funding? CPCs are a charity and exist on voluntary contributions.

* Have the county engage in a “public awareness campaign” – a publicly financed propaganda effort against pro-life centers. NARAL believes this “would be an effective educational tool” for the county's women. Advertisement

Yeah, lets have the county also make people aware of what really goes on inside abortion clinics.

* Create a private right of action for women who say they were “harmed” by CPCs, allowing them to sue. “NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland suggests first trying to prevent such harm from occurring.”

Abortions clinics harm women and babies, in fact they kill all the babies and maim the souls of all the women.

* “The FDA has clear regulations regarding ultrasounds that are not currently enforced.”

Again, an ultrasound is not invasive like a suction machine.

6 posted on 01/13/2015 6:16:06 PM PST by Slyfox (To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
"Ironically, this story is breaking just days after NARAL sued the state of Ohio for all communications with Ohio Right to Life, expressing its civic-minded concern that Ohio RTL exerts “improper” influence over the state's public servants."

As if pro-abortion groups haven't been lobbying politicians for decades, and getting hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies for their efforts. Is that "improper influence"?
7 posted on 01/13/2015 6:29:52 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...

Baby killers hate competition.

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


8 posted on 01/13/2015 6:49:40 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Je suis Charlie, you miserable Islamist throwbacks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

`


9 posted on 01/13/2015 6:57:01 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("I set before you this day Life and Death, a Blessing and a Curse. Therefore choose LIfe.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Prayers up for the millions of children this group plans to kill. And their mothers who are led to believe they have the right to kill their own children.


10 posted on 01/13/2015 7:21:05 PM PST by kitkat (STORM HEAVEN WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson