Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
I didn't know that.

I do know why they had engine size restrictions. Back in the late 1960's Ford was putting 427s in the Ford GT 40's and the European car manufactures couldn't compete with the Americans on that scale.

Gas mileage requirements will probably keep engine size smaller.

84 posted on 01/12/2015 9:30:16 AM PST by painter ( Isaiah: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: painter

Follow up:

http://www.europeanlemansseries.com/en/s02_corporate/s02p14_reglement.php

I guess that was only for the Grand Touring Challenge division.


86 posted on 01/12/2015 9:34:16 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: painter

“I do know why they had engine size restrictions. Back in the late 1960’s Ford was putting 427s in the Ford GT 40’s and the European car manufactures couldn’t compete with the Americans on that scale.”

At that time the ACO limited displacement to 7 liters, and for whatever reason none of the European manufacturers built an engine anywhere near that large. As one example, Porsche stuck with a 3.0L engine in the 908 and didn’t go larger until the homologation requirements for Group 6 (which had a 5.0L limit) in the late ‘60s were decreased from 50 cars to 25, at which point they developed the 917.

The rest is, as they say, history. That era was a great one for endurance racing.


99 posted on 01/12/2015 4:34:03 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (Nothing is sometimes the right thing to do, and always a wise thing to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson