Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o
... that he believed in subsidiarity– that is the principle that power should reside at the most immediate level possible.

I feel likewise as it is the sovereign anodyne to imperial power. You can talk and reason with your local city council or county commission, good luck with doing that with the President or even your local US Representative.

4 posted on 01/03/2015 1:51:56 PM PST by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SES1066

Excellent concept and excellent point!


5 posted on 01/03/2015 1:56:17 PM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SES1066

On the other hand.

Localized oppression can be far more personal.

The heyday of subsidiarity was the Middle Ages, where the lord of the Manor often held the rights of Low, Middle and High Justice.

IOW, your judge was very likely to be the guy your dispute was with.

In general, lower and middle class people were always in favor of the King’s justice. He might be distant, but he was also unbiased for that very reason. In fact, the King generally had an incentive to stomp on over-mighty subjects oppressing his less powerful subjects.

Much of the history of the late Middle Ages and early modern periods is of an alliance between the King and the lower and (especially) middle classes.


8 posted on 01/03/2015 2:17:00 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SES1066

The USA in the Progressive Era, up to present, has been all about establishing the inverse of subsidiarity.


10 posted on 01/03/2015 2:56:30 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson