Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-choice reporter responds to display of aborted babies
Live Action News ^ | Dec 12, 2014 | Sarah Terzo

Posted on 12/13/2014 9:55:58 PM PST by Morgana

Monica Migliorino Miller and several other pro-lifers set up a display of aborted babies outside the abortion clinic where they were found. Miller and the others had retrieved the aborted babies from the clinic’s trash.

Pro-Choice columnist Linda Gorov of the Chicago Sun-Times wrote about the display:

All the antiabortion pickets in the world cannot convey the loss you feel when you look at a 10 week old fetus in the bright sun light. You can be for abortion or against abortion. It doesn’t matter. You look and you look away and you feel lousy for a long time afterward.

This reporter “feels lousy” because she knows she’s looking at a dead body and not a clump of cells. There would be no reason to “feel lousy” otherwise. There would be no reason to be distressed over a clump of tissue. Instinctively, this reporter knows that the baby she sees is a dead human being, not just a surgical byproduct.

Seeing a 10 week-old baby with little arms and legs torn from his or her body by a suction machine is horrific. On my website, you can see a picture of the face of an aborted baby at 10 weeks, his mouth open in a silent scream. Even though many pro-choicers are hardened enough to block out images of aborted babies, many undecided and uncommitted people can be converted by them. They can also inspire nominally pro-life people to become more active in the movement.

One of the hardest things to understand, as a pro-lifer, is how some pro-choice people can look at pictures of unborn children with little arms and legs and fingers and toes, with little faces, and not see that they are people. Perhaps they know that they are people but refuse to admit it. Layers of denial must build up before a person can see a picture of an aborted child and still maintain that women should have unrestricted access to abortion. It can be hard to respond to, or understand, this hardness of heart.

Pictures of aborted children, or even demonstrations showing their remains, will sadly not be the magic bullet that ends abortion. But they are still an important tool, one that can unsettle even those committed to promoting abortion.

Source: Monica Migliorino Miller Abandoned: the Untold Story of the Abortion Wars (Charlotte, North Carolina: St. Benedict Press, 2012) 135


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Local News
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortiondisplay; prolife; reporter

1 posted on 12/13/2014 9:55:58 PM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Sobering.


2 posted on 12/13/2014 9:57:48 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Pro lifers who carry signs showing aborted babies are called sick and disgusting by pro-abortionists. Maybe the caption should read “Don’t worry, this is just a malignant clump of cells removed after 21 weeks of growth”.


3 posted on 12/13/2014 10:06:11 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Yes, “pro-choicers” are so morally superior to the rest of us. God (or nogod) forbid they should have to see the results of their choices. Which is pretty much what liberals are all about. Don’t confuse them with the facts. It gets them all messed up in the head. Oughta be laws against that. Which is why they are such control freaks.


4 posted on 12/13/2014 10:16:04 PM PST by bluejean (The lunatics are running the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

That is how we get to Earth.


5 posted on 12/13/2014 10:16:07 PM PST by FreeperCell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Why isn’t there a “pro-choice” position on other issues, like slavery for instance? In that case we are merely depriving another individual of his liberty.


6 posted on 12/13/2014 10:35:17 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluejean

What makes them control freaks, I think, is knowing somewhere deep down that they’re just wrong. They certainly can’t provide rational arguments for most of their beliefs, so they try to eliminate the counter-arguments. What they can’t do by persuasion, they try to do by force.


7 posted on 12/13/2014 10:36:32 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

It is an oppression. Just like all the others.


8 posted on 12/13/2014 10:45:06 PM PST by FreeperCell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

After the third trimester, perhaps they should offer a coin toss to see who gets to leave the abortatorium alive, the mother or the child.

Call it the random choice movement.


9 posted on 12/13/2014 10:52:32 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Yes. I agree. They have to shove it down our throats


10 posted on 12/13/2014 11:49:33 PM PST by FreeperCell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

It’s amazing how embarrassed they are when their so precious “right to choose” is put on display.

People that exercise their 2nd Amendment rights have no issue happily talking about it for as long as you want.


11 posted on 12/14/2014 3:10:01 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

In demented Lieberal World the aborted babies get no voice and no choice. There’s an eternal reckoning for all of this ghoulish behavior and being aborted from heaven is far, far worse.


12 posted on 12/14/2014 6:00:06 AM PST by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
Why isn’t there a “pro-choice” position on other issues, like slavery for instance?

The "Pro-Choice" (i.e. "Liberal/Progressive") crowd is opposed to choice on so many lesser issues also.

School lunch menus
Light bulb types
Individuals managing the "habitat for the endangered jumping mouse" on their own property by removing dead brush which might fuel a forest/brush fire and destroy their home. Or draining a mosquito breeding swamp ("destruction of wetlands - $50,000 fine")
Buy a model of vehicle not approved by the EPA & NHTSA

13 posted on 12/14/2014 6:27:52 AM PST by BwanaNdege (I wonder which side they choose whe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson