Posted on 12/03/2014 3:41:55 PM PST by PROCON
Under the see!
If coprophiliacs have sexual rights in Obama’s new gay friendly military, why are voyeurs being discriminated against?
just imagine seeing your 18 or 19 yro son in such a predicament...
maybe if it was sons that were harassed in such a way, it wouldn't be such a laughing matter among freepers over the mere women sailors....
immorality, decadence,indecency,plain old sin begins when everything is just "excused" and accepted....
I'm sure if one of these women sailors was raped it'd be a big Ha Ha as well...
You know, I made a HEROIC effort not to mention that movie, and then you had to go and ruin everything.
Now I have to go watch it.
For research purposes.
Well, hey, that’s the Air Scouts. I mean, gosh and golly, they probably do that for the (putatively) male recruits as well.
I used to have a good friend that was a submariner and have known others, they are strange personalities and I used to question him about the difference between the Army life I had known versus the Submariner life that he was living as a CPO.
He said that one huge difference was the inability to absorb someone who was too far out of the fold, because living enclosed under water creates very unusual human dynamics, and that a crew could become fixated on a personality that they couldn’t tolerate, to the level that the individual would have to be removed, there was no escape from each other and things can get very strange and intense under the conditions, as far as feelings becoming magnified and out of whack.
To introduce an entirely new sex, and one whose failings and inappropriate personalty will be ignored because of her sex and affirmative action, as will the effect they have on the stability of the male personalities and relationships, may spell very serious trouble for sub crews.
LOL...
...or young women and young women. The military is full of predatory lebeasians these days, I hear.
Hulloooo?
History will look back on this and people will scratch their heads at how it could ever have even happened.
*sigh* Women can be warriors, but they have to accept that a woman's role is as a different kind of warrior.
... TTIUWP ...
When the male submariners talk about nice torpedoes they are not talking about torpedoes....
Ruh Roh!
Thanks for sharing that, it makes perfect sense. In fact it makes more than perfect sense - it seems so obvious that the actual shrinks in charge of evaluating sub crews (and I’m sure is a formalized field by now) MUST have known the catastrophes that would inevitably follow sex integration on subs. The military is stress, a sub is contained stress. Guys prank each other, at the very least, to deal with stress and bonding. So not only can’t that be done between sexes, it can’t even be done within one sex anymore because of equality regs. So... No more pressure release valves.
Hey, what could POSSIBLY go wrong?
For what seems to me, albeit from zero military experience, to be a very well thought out approach to actually developing women into combat soldiers. To the extent that might be possible.
http://www.baen.com/amazonsrightbreast.asp
When I became a Company XO, I was told part of my job was to make people cry. My CO liked to play the good cop/bad cop game, and he liked being the good cop.
Leftist’s solution to the problem? MORE WOMEN ON SUBS!!!
There was no seaman in the shower!
ROTFL! Oh man...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.