Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU Court Bans Sexuality Tests for Gay Asylum Seekers
Newsweek ^ | December 2, 2014 | Amelia Smith

Posted on 12/02/2014 12:31:22 PM PST by CreviceTool

Today the court ruled that the credibility of an asylum claim on the basis of homosexuality could not be rejected just because the person in question refuses to answer questions about their personal circumstances. While national authorities are entitled to interview asylum applicants, they must do so in a way that does not violate the right of the asylum seekers private and family life.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: europe; gay; homosexualagenda; sexuality
Hmmm..."Until 2011, Czech authorities used ‘phallometric tests’ to try to determine sexual orientation in asylum processes, a practice developed in the early years of Communist Czechoslovakia that involved using rubber tubes to measure the blood circulation in a man’s penis when shown pornographic material."
1 posted on 12/02/2014 12:31:22 PM PST by CreviceTool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CreviceTool

I would have them prove they are gay.


2 posted on 12/02/2014 12:36:55 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

That’s been one of the counters to the whole “this is who I am” assertion from the left.
If someone claimed to be gay in order to get some benefit,
how would they prove it?

By an ACT. It is the ACT that defines it.


3 posted on 12/02/2014 12:38:21 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CreviceTool

So, exactly how “gay” are you?


4 posted on 12/02/2014 12:48:04 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreviceTool
While national authorities are entitled to interview asylum applicants, they must do so in a way that does not violate the right of the asylum seekers private and family life.

How does that violate any rights to privacy? Their entire claim to asylum throws that 'privacy' out into the public view.
5 posted on 12/02/2014 2:16:03 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson