Team Planning Guide for your "National Day of Reckoning" protest against Obama's Illegal Amnesty - (click)
.
Posted on 11/23/2014 9:46:35 AM PST by Ray76
Unless there is an unlawful EO, there is no unlawful Amnesty. Period. You can see the White House website yourself. The memos from the 21st are there. There is no EO from around that date.
/johnny
“There was no immigration EO.”
*******************************************************************************
Fox says there is.
There is no EO out there. No EO, no unlawful amnesty.
He is no closer to amnesty today than he was a month ago.
/johnny
/johnny
Your diligence is the only accurate reportin
Hat tip to ya
Your link indicates that AP supplied the news feed that Fox used.
Where’s the text of these two historic EO’s?
You have it at hand, right? Show us.
The Federal Register will tell. It usually takes several days for items to appear there.
Now on Thursday he added all the alleged parents of these illegal "children" (AND the week before the State Dept announced that they will give visas to any additional alleged children that want to come here)
AND the vile little cur also says "this is just the beginning".
“...He is no closer to amnesty today than he was a month ago.
/johnny”
*********************************************************************************************************
Well, I agree with that. Actually, he’s no closer to amnesty today than he was 6 years ago. Whatever he signed and whatever he calls it, it is not amnesty. Obama and the ‘RATS have no intention of trying to do a unilateral amnesty. They are simply trying to trick the POTENTIALLY hapless Republican leadership into doing something stupid or enacting “Amnesty Light”; there’s no need to do either.
For the lame duck they should simply pass a continuing resolution FOR 3 MONTHS ONLY (which should include provision for a ZERO percent pay raise for our overpaid federal employees, so Obama doesn’t give them a pay raise on his own). In January they can get serious with the new Republican AND MORE CONSERVATIVE Congress.
And we need a real budget, not CRs.
/johnny
/johnny
bacon and eggs please,over medium
But in practice if the court doesn't issue a writ of certiorari the cases are filtered through the circuit courts which sometimes rule lack of standing see Mass vs EPA. The Supreme Court ruled by 5-4 that Massachusetts did have standing to sue. (Roberts, Alito, Scalia and Thomas voted against standing). That is why I'm in favor of a tactic making the suit go the opposite direction.
Because that would not further the Revolution.
This is done now to say, "F*** you, Republicans, f*** you, whites, f*** your supposed "House of Representatives", f*** your "elections", they ain't worth s***, FOAD crackers".
As one of Obama's favorite philosophers said, people will follow the strong horse.
This move is simply meant to crush the GOP by proving to their loyal voters that electing them to high office doesn't matter, that the Revolution proceeds on schedule.
You are following that, right? It may get Obamacare struck down.
/johnny
“bacon and eggs please,over medium”
********************************************************************************
I’ll have the Eggs Benedict, please.
And Johnny, I do believe that I’m sensing that Barrack “Don’t call my bluff” Obama’s bluff is in the process of being called. And I’ll be tickled pink if that is what happens.
It was saved in case the GOP ever controlled the House and Senate
No it came through the court of appeals, There were two different cases with two different decisions so the Supreme court decided on a writ of certiorari on King vs Burwell. It was not a direct to SCOTUS case.
Obama has already said he wants the House to pass legislation that he likes.
I can make Eggs Benedict. Hollandaise sauce was one of my final practical exams. ;)
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.