Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why wasn't Obamnesty granted 6 years ago?
WND ^ | Nov 21, 2014 | Joshua Charles

Posted on 11/23/2014 9:46:35 AM PST by Ray76

Obama has claimed that the reasons he has taken this step of an executive order is because Congress had supposedly done nothing, and the steps he has taken will improve the immigration system. Let us, for the moment, assume his premise is entirely true. Here’s the problem: Executive orders have NOTHING to do with Congress. They are entirely within the purview of the Executive Branch (assuming they are legal, which, for the moment, I will grant the president). And since they are an entirely presidential matter, why has he not done anything with that power until now?

The president has blamed others for his exercise of a power which only he can exercise.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: amnesty; eo; executiveamnesty; executiveorder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2014 9:46:35 AM PST by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ray76

And another question is this. If this was such a great idea only upheld by the wicked Republicans, why didn’t the Democrat controlled House and Senate and Obama do this type of action in his first two years?


2 posted on 11/23/2014 9:48:21 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

He took an oath to uphold the law. His executive privilege does not give him the right to suspend laws.


3 posted on 11/23/2014 9:48:51 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

There are no more elections in his way.


4 posted on 11/23/2014 9:51:37 AM PST by uncitizen (I weep for my country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

If he was going to do something, he should have done it after the 2012 election. This is all about giving the finger to red state America.


5 posted on 11/23/2014 9:51:43 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

The liberals have got all kinds of excuses. They just can’t explain why he was able to force Obamacare down our throats with the same number of votes.

For that matter, he had more votes for Amnesty than Obamacare. Team McCain was all for amnesty.


6 posted on 11/23/2014 9:51:49 AM PST by cripplecreek (You can't half ass conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

After King Barry got away with releasing 5 Taliban Commanders and suffering NO consequences from doing so, he believes he can do anything he wishes now..


7 posted on 11/23/2014 9:53:04 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

He did not want to answer to we the people. He waited until the political costs would be the most minimal.


8 posted on 11/23/2014 9:54:52 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Obama has held amnesty out as a bait to secure the Hispanic vote. With the Republican congressional gains and the likelihood that they would pass something on immigration reform and securing the borders, amnesty’s shelf life had run out. That and the fact that amnesty is not uniformly popular with Hispanic voters and is not well received by other groups.


9 posted on 11/23/2014 9:57:25 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
There was no immigration EO.

/johnny

10 posted on 11/23/2014 9:57:31 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

QUOTE from Elle Kynzer, Blogz.org

“The Democrat Senate could have passed the Immigration bill anytime in the past six years, no problem, so why didn’t they? The reason it did not pass before the 2012 election was so Obama would get a second term, and not before 2014 because with half the country objecting, the Democrats thought they might lose.....well, they lost anyway. However, WHY NOT NOW? The Democrats are a majority vote in the Senate, and still in power until January, 2015, when the new Congress is sworn in. Why did they not do it this past week, if they care so much about the illegals, and the cost of deportation? Maybe the left half doesn’t get it after all, and Gruber is half right! Obama complains about the Republicans not doing it, but they did not have in six years the Senate Vote to do it!”

http://shariaunveiled.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/obama-allows-80000-muslim-immigrants-into-the-united-states/

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Muslim-immigrants-security-threat/2014/09/24/id/596742/

http://www.newsmax.com/Clare


11 posted on 11/23/2014 9:58:24 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Socialized medicine if firmly rooted into the country will irreversibly alter this country and probably the world.

that was the goal from the start and immigration is just the icing on the cake.

Next stop is one world government.

12 posted on 11/23/2014 9:59:19 AM PST by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Because Obummer wanted a second term.


13 posted on 11/23/2014 10:03:45 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

It is to punish the wicked troglodites for voting against the emperor. Also, I have no doubt Obama and Boehner / McConnel conspired behind closed doors. Boehner and his base of cronies want amnesty just as bad but for other reasons.


14 posted on 11/23/2014 10:06:05 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Obama DID DO OBAMANISTY 6 Years ago. Six years ago his “policy” was to essentially NOT DEPORT other than a modest number of aliens. Now, his “executive action” is exactly the same thing .. .. .. to NOT DEPORT other than a modest number of aliens. SAME OLD, SAME OLD.

LET’S NOT PLAY OBAMA’S GAME. Let’s pass a simple continuing resolution for 3 months only in this December lame duck session. Then, when the new Republican Congress takes office in January, get busy with BORDER ENFORCEMENT / TIGHTENING ONLY legislation. LET’S PLAY OUR GAME!

Obama and the ‘RATS know they are weak now and WEAKENING MORE in January. Don’t let them cow us into passing AMNESTY LIGHT. BORDER SECURITY ONLY.


15 posted on 11/23/2014 10:07:21 AM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

Don’t get ahead of yourself. They’d have top flip Texas first and foremost. Which is what this is all about.


16 posted on 11/23/2014 10:08:35 AM PST by BillyBonebrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Do you have proof?


17 posted on 11/23/2014 10:09:15 AM PST by Ray76 (When Obama speaks he speaks as the leader of a foreign invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
There was no immigration EO.

States should not accept his statements or any EO that he may issue to provide State benefits to illegals. If courts are always saying States do not have standing, put the onus on the DOJ to have to move it through the court system.

18 posted on 11/23/2014 10:20:58 AM PST by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
The States, under Art. III of the Constitution, can go directly to the Supreme Court. The Congress can't do that.

The Constitution gives States standing, and the Supreme Court original jurisdiction.

/johnny

19 posted on 11/23/2014 10:33:26 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ray76; JRandomFreeper

“Do you have proof?”

Interesting question that. Asking one to prove a negative.

It’s my turn.

Where are the WH photos of Obama signing these alleged two historic EO’s? There’s usually a crowd of syncophants surrounding him.

Whitehouse.gov as of this morning had none.

Check this National Archive page.
www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/2014.html

Last EO signed Oct 2014

Show us the transcript of the EO’s if you can find it.

Give us the historic video link showing Obama signing it. Gotta be few out there from the major media, no?

The truth is out there, right?


20 posted on 11/23/2014 10:33:45 AM PST by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson