Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: right-wing agnostic

What does this mean in English?


2 posted on 11/03/2014 12:24:08 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lurk
What does this mean in English?

Sounds like it means the Court will be asked to rule on a narrower, more technical question that bears on the legality of ObamaCare.

The Court was not willing to summarily throw the whole mess into the garbage can. They did, however, (IIRC) signal their willingness to look at individual aspects of the law once those aspects had been argued through the lower courts.

There are many of these aspects, and this one is important because it goes to the issue of what is a tax. This question, as I understand it, brings Constitutional issues into the discussion.

Also keep in mind the "non-separability" aspect of ObamaCare. If any one piece of it is excrement-canned, the whole thing goes down the chute.

3 posted on 11/03/2014 12:30:28 PM PST by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lurk

“grant certiorari” basically means the court is taking the case.
That they didn’t say today they would or wouldn’t means they’re still looking at the merits of taking it, instead of just rejecting it outright (like >96% of all submitted cases). That they’re continuing to look at it means it’s got about a 50/50 chance of being accepted, though probably with some modifications (some cases would be rejected outright as submitted, but contain some element that the Court feels must be addressed, so they trim it accordingly).


6 posted on 11/03/2014 12:38:20 PM PST by ctdonath2 (You know what, just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lurk

Certiorari means the Supreme Court will hear the case.

This case is important because if the plaintiffs prevail, then obamacare goes bye-bye. It will at least be shut down in 34 states if plaintiffs prevail and it is doubtful to survive if only 16 states are implementing it.


8 posted on 11/03/2014 12:51:07 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lurk
It means we have a chance.
If SCOTUS denies cert then it's pretty much over, and the IRS rule (which is contrary to the statute) granting subsidies to people in states without state run exchanges will stand.
Halbig is the case from the D.C Circuit which ruled 2-1 against the IRS, but the fully packed 0bama court granted en banc review and vacated the panel's judgment.
If SCOTUS grants cert in this 4th Circuit case then that is a good sign, and we really have nothing to lose since it isn't a case of Constitutional interpretation.
10 posted on 11/03/2014 1:08:59 PM PST by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lurk
In addition to the other replies you received: the 9 Supreme Court justices meet in conference to decide which appeals they will hear and decide. If at least four decide to go ahead, then they grant certiorari, meaning they will hear the case.
11 posted on 11/03/2014 1:10:24 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson