Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: I May Run Again
USA Today ^ | 10/28/14 | (Alaskan 2016)

Posted on 10/28/2014 5:37:03 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last
To: caww
Sarah and her family make themselves easy targets and just seems to be ‘part of’ the media’s ‘entertainment’ for the masses.

It doesn’t matter to me how the media spins their life...it matters that they give them the ammunition to do so and then feed into it.

I think that's more perception, than reality, caww.

The press has followed Sarah and her family's every little move since the day she gave her acceptance speech in 2008. They lie in wait for any Palin to make the slightest misstep, so they can blow it up into a manufactured controversy.

The press are masters at this. In the so-called 'Palin Brawl', it was Sarah's daughter who was physically attacked and assaulted, but the press spun it to make it sound as though the Palin family walked into someone else's home looking for a fight. If you'd take the time to read what the Palins themselves had to say about it, you might feel a lot different about that incident.

And so it's gone with every other flap in the press about the Palin family. They don't have to move a muscle to be attacked and vilified by the media. They just have to be breathing. Their very existence is a threat to the left wing, who need no prompting or openings whatsoever on the Palins' part, to find a way to trash them.

If there's anything we've learned in the six years we've known the Palins, it's that.

What on earth did Sarah and her family ever do to deserve the massive public beat-down they've endured all these years? Absolutely nothing, except be everything the left is not, and show by example what worthless liars and frauds the left wing is.

121 posted on 10/28/2014 8:38:55 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

Ba Da Bing!


122 posted on 10/28/2014 8:48:16 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

+ + + 1


123 posted on 10/28/2014 9:09:09 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

I notice she didn’t say run for what office? Could she mean for a Senate seat in 2016? Isn’t Lisa what’s her face up for re-election then?


124 posted on 10/28/2014 9:59:28 PM PDT by Catsrus (al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Because the Party Lords had decided it was Mitt’s Turn. He had it, by now it must be Sarah’s Turn. Going against the principle of everybody gets a turn would threaten the very foundation of the GOP.


125 posted on 10/28/2014 10:36:13 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (without fear or favour: no dog in the fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Let’s extend a warm welcome to our POTUS 2016


126 posted on 10/29/2014 3:12:33 AM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (And 2016 as well)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I think the media attack on her family “brawl” has changed the game. It has provided Gov Palin with the catalyst she needed. Why should we complain?


127 posted on 10/29/2014 3:19:16 AM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (And 2016 as well)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

but run for real

I agree. But “run for real” to me means no holds barred on smacking down her opponents. Drag out all the dirt and latch on to the democrats like a pit bull. Expose hildabeast for the wicked witch that she is. Expound upon all those who enabled obama and the fraud of his administration. Be a wrecking ball!


128 posted on 10/29/2014 5:54:20 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Texas isn't just a state. It's a state of mind!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero; txhurl

Tea Party?


129 posted on 10/29/2014 5:57:52 AM PDT by SisterK (we are being set up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Allen lost his last election.

He lost because the district was redrawn so that he would lose.


130 posted on 10/29/2014 5:58:55 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Texas isn't just a state. It's a state of mind!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

I don’t know.

I won’t say I disagree with you, but I am not ready to say I agree either.

Last time around was a fluke (it seems). I believe Sarah has one good run in her. I believe she may run this time, and I believe good and well, she may win.

Until I receive any conflicting information, that is my base of beliefs.

I believe Sarah took a four-year break to be a mother. Period. And she’s done quite a good job.

Palin 2016.


131 posted on 10/29/2014 6:31:43 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
And that would not have been possible if Cain hadn't had a Mistress or more on the side. If Herman had done nothing wrong he wouldn't have withdrawn

Horse Petunias! It's a moot point now, but you know as well as I do, according to liberal twisted logic, it's not whether the charges are true, it's the seriousness of the charge. He will always be the candidate who was "accused".

132 posted on 10/29/2014 7:26:35 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

Gawdamn RINO noobs.


133 posted on 10/29/2014 7:43:25 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle
Horse Petunias! It's a moot point now, but you know as well as I do, according to liberal twisted logic, it's not whether the charges are true, it's the seriousness of the charge. He will always be the candidate who was "accused".

Nonsense. By your logic anyone can be accused of cheating on their spouse and driven from office. If that were the case Gloria Allred could find a former associate of EVERY conservative and claim they had an affair with her/him. That would never work because most of the conservative targets would simply laugh off the allegations because they were so utterly untrue.

Anyone with nothing to hide would survive these accusations - and often emerge stronger. The people that don't survive these types of charges are politicians with something to hide which they can't defend. Herman Cain was the latter. In the end it doesn't matter since Cain was never a serious candidate in the first place.

134 posted on 10/29/2014 8:23:06 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson