Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Enterprise

“hot’ young women are usually ignorant and should NOT vote or be allowed on juries because ‘they don’t get it’”

I’d say most women shouldn’t be allowed to vote at all.
It says all men are created equal, not women. You see
women are controlled by emotion and vote accordingly, men
control their emotions and vote accordingly. Women vote on a whim,
men vote on principle. Men have honor, women don’t.


8 posted on 10/23/2014 4:09:38 PM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slambat

Keep in mind that the collectivists worked hard in the early 20th century to give women the right to vote because women more often than not vote for collectivist leaders, proposed laws, etc., and they are much easier to manipulate than men.


21 posted on 10/23/2014 4:39:54 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Slambat

LOL


31 posted on 10/23/2014 5:18:54 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Slambat

Since we’re following your logic and reasoning for taking away Constitutional rights, let’s also go with taking away men’s right to keep and bear arms.


34 posted on 10/23/2014 5:24:21 PM PDT by coop71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Slambat

“Women vote on a whim, men vote on principle. Men have honor, women don’t.”

I regret I must agree.
As a generalization: The consistent slide to communistic tyranny accelerated once the 19th Amendment was passed.
Television gave the presidency to reprobates like Kennedy, Clinton, and Obama because women are not only more emotional, but are also more sexual than is supposed: They vote for males they perceive as more handsome and/or more virile, regardless of his principles (or lack thereof).
Stereotypes exist for a reason; the statistics of the female vote are telling.
It is only wrong to assume that a specific woman is overly controlled by her emotions, et cetera; as a group they are costing us the Republic.


55 posted on 10/23/2014 7:42:33 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson