Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr170IQ

“....Favipiravir (T-705) is the best treatment option available. However,it is not FDA approved,so getting it in the USA isn’t easy. ....”

What side effects does favipiravir have, as compared to the ‘next-best’ one that is approved?

Its OK in Europe, so presumably the effects aren’t worse than that ‘next- best’ one.

Why won’t the FDA approve things that work?


4 posted on 10/19/2014 5:43:06 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57

That ‘next-best’ one:

“.... Lamivudine is probably the next best choice,and it is FDA approved (for HIV and Hepititis B) and off-patent so it is both widely available and fairly cheap. ....”


5 posted on 10/19/2014 5:44:48 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WildHighlander57

Favipiravir is currently undergoing Phase-3 clinical trials in the USA as a flu treatment - http://www.favorflustudy.com/

The chemical doesn’t appear to affect mammalian cells that much, but it does appear to have caused some gastrointestinal side-effects in a small number of cases, from what I’ve heard.

The drug was developed in 1998, and is owned by Fujifilm, which holds the patent on it for another few years. Japan has a large stockpile of Favipiravir, ostensibly for flu epidemics.


10 posted on 10/19/2014 6:20:26 AM PDT by Mr170IQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson