Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator

I think it would have been wiser to let the investigation take place instead of presume guilt. Plenty of time to suspend someone charged with a felony, if it happens. Once Harris’ attorney hit the airwaves with evidence exonerating his client the accuser recanted. This title IX presumption of guilt crap is flat unAmerican.


8 posted on 10/10/2014 10:13:31 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Gunslingr3

I think Muschamp told her to do it. Anything to protect his Golden Boy, Driskel.


12 posted on 10/10/2014 11:36:49 PM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Gunslingr3

“I think it would have been wiser to let the investigation take place instead of presume guilt. Plenty of time to suspend someone charged with a felony, if it happens. Once Harris’ attorney hit the airwaves with evidence exonerating his client the accuser recanted. This title IX presumption of guilt crap is flat unAmerican.”

In the UK the accuser’s and accused’s name are kept confidential. Yet another thing the American justice system has screwed up. The accused’s name gets splashed all over the media, while the accused sits back and watches her lawyers try the case in the court of public opinion as part of their pre-civil claim strategy. (Meanwhile, in the Winston case, few in the media are reporting that the SA’s released documents show she refused to identify Winston to police although her deleted facebook and twitter accounts showed she knew him, changed her story 3 times when each version was belied by the physical evidence, stayed in class with him despite the school victim advocates’ offer to move her, refused to cooperate with any Title IX investigation, and didn’t release her claim though her aunt’s lawyer friend until 8 months later when the previously unknown freshman had become the FSU QB and was suddenly the front runner for the Heisman and the #1 draft pick).

It’s the new witch hunt: 400 years ago, a man could accuse a woman of witchcraft, and she could either prove her innocence by drowning, or float and be burned at the stake— a no-win situation for the accused. Publicly accuse a man of sexual assault, and his reputation is ruined regardless how it turns out. Liberals love it because they get to harp about the victimization of women.


15 posted on 10/11/2014 4:59:29 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson