Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kennard

First and foremost it gets the corrupt, politically-motivated FCC involved with net traffic.

Today it’s ‘correcting inefficiencies and putting packets on equal footing,’ tomorrow it’s inevitably ‘policing hate speech.’

We’ve all seen this film dozens of times before with various technologies and industries. Simply the thin end of the wedge.


27 posted on 10/09/2014 6:27:45 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: relictele; Olog-hai
First and foremost it gets the corrupt, politically-motivated FCC involved with net traffic.

Today it’s ‘correcting inefficiencies and putting packets on equal footing,’ tomorrow it’s inevitably ‘policing hate speech.’

We’ve all seen this film dozens of times before with various technologies and industries. Simply the thin end of the wedge.

That makes sense to a small government conservative. How do you explain that to the average voter, however, when the proposal sounds like motherhood and apple pie?

43 posted on 10/09/2014 8:22:12 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson