[Vaduz]

Looks like the Supreme Court needs some law books and someone to explain to them what we the people means.

[Sgt_Schultze]

To the Supreme Court, We The People means whatever the single swing justice decides. Whomever casts the 5th vote in any divided decision, is essentially the King of America who rules by proclamation, as it is he (or she) alone whose decision carries weight.

[LibertarianLiz]

Looks like the Supreme Court needs some law books and someone to explain to them what we the people means.

Also, Federalism.

Also, what cowards, really. Instead of just taking hold of it, and discussing and hearing arguments from both sides; they just decide, not to decide. They leave the appeals courts to decide. This isn't helpful.

Although, not "deciding" actually decided quite a bit. The individual states have no say in this matter, nor do the citizens who wanted these bans. So, the activists and their supporters in the corrupted media get to decide what is marriage in every state of the Union, basically redefining marriage for everyone. Nice.