See any BG faces that look familiar?
Posted on 10/01/2014 6:35:57 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican senator, could be running for President in the 2016 elections, according to an article featured in The Druge Report. According to the sources, who are reportedly close to Cruz, claim that he will be making the announcement before the end of 2014.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/ted-cruz-to-run-for-president-in-2016-foreign-policy-to-be-his-main-focus-127320/
(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...
And it is happening right in Texas.
America's eyes are focused there. Cruz and Perry, now is your time.
Let’s see if we make it to 2016.
Man, you said it!
With the election in 2016 is really a stretch to predict that someone would declare by the end of the year? Hell I predict 80% of the losers from the last republican primary will announce by march of next year.
I totally love Cruz, and agree with probably 99% of what he stands for, but he won’t win a national election. He won’t be a good candidate, because he lacks the charisma/charm that’s necessary for our dumbed down electorate when it comes to a presidential candidate.
He would be a WONDERFUL Attorney General, or perhaps a solid VP candidate.
Let’s see if we make it to 2016.
That’s for sure.
Remember, too, he's running against Hillary, and it's simply the more charismatic candidate. He could easily pull that off.
... because he lacks the charisma/charm that’s necessary for our dumbed down electorate when it comes to a presidential candidate.
////////////////////////////////////////////
He’s a brilliant man quite capable of simplifying an idea so that even the simplest of minds gets it.
But don’t keep us in suspense. Who is it that has the charisma you speak of?
Shouldn’t this be in “chat”? </sarc>
Actually it is in Chat, along with Business/Economy. :D
I totally love Cruz, and agree with probably 99% of what he stands for, but he won’t win a national election. He won’t be a good candidate, because he lacks the charisma/charm that’s necessary for our dumbed down electorate when it comes to a presidential candidate.
So who would you choose as the Republican candidate? Who is better?
After the November election, the most dangerous place on the planet will be the two rings that Democrats and Republicans are tossing the presidential wannabe hats.
“I totally love Cruz, and agree with probably 99% of what he stands for, but he won’t win a national election. He won’t be a good candidate, because he lacks the charisma/charm that’s necessary for our dumbed down electorate when it comes to a presidential candidate.”
Disagree. He has more charisma in his left big toe than most every other candidate. The only reason he might lose is that this country is irreparably composed of a bunch of takers who will have none of a message of personal responsibility, free markets, smaller government, liberty and constitutionalism.
My suggestion is for conservatives to ask liberals. Liberals won’t be protected from the chaos being created by the democrats. Their kids won’t be immune from ebola or any other disease brought by uncontrolled borders. Their children face the same future of slavery as ours do.
“Are you prepared to martyr your children to protect the democrats?”
If he isn’t a member of the Bohemian Grove he’ll never win it.
Was Reagan a member?
(I honestly don’t know the answer, just asking that)
Any prospective GOP nominees members now?
I’m guessing Bush. But any others?
How about Romney? Perry?
For that matter, which Democrats are members as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.