Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored

While the chart is interesting, the increase in the number of Ebola deaths will not continue at its current rate, but if it does, it means we are all dead two and a half years.


8 posted on 09/15/2014 12:24:02 AM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Oliviaforever

“...the increase in the number of Ebola deaths will not continue at its current rate...”

Why is that?


9 posted on 09/15/2014 12:35:23 AM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Not all of us...30 per cent are surviving the disease including an unknown number of lesser sick almost silent infected persons.


11 posted on 09/15/2014 12:44:02 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever; null and void; 21twelve
> While the chart is interesting, the increase in the number of Ebola deaths will not continue at its current rate, but if it does, it means we are all dead two and a half years.

I expect three things to change the slope of the straight lines on the semi-log graph.

1. In the short term, once the African cities explode, the straight lines will continue, and perhaps even tilt upward (faster spread) a little bit, because the virus will have a temporarily unlimited supply of new victims in easy reach. This will accelerate the spread, but it can't do so for too long without reaching a temporary limit.

It is the same effect as a bacteria colony in a Petri dish -- until the media is completely covered (i.e. until each city is saturated with victims), the colony will grow exponentially. When all the media is covered (i.e. when each city is full of sick/dead people), the rate of new cases will drop in that city.

But as soon as it jumps to a new city, the cycle will repeat. Given enough cities (a half dozen will do nicely), the overall cumulative spread will be pretty much straight in line with what I drew, and continue into 2015 largely unabated.

2. In the mid-term, Africa will be fully involved, Europe and the Middle East will be in trouble, and we'll be fighting localized outbreaks in the Western Hemisphere. I'm less worried about spread in the continental U.S. than I am in South and Central America, where living and sanitation conditions are not substantially better than in Africa. Here in the U.S. we have a chance of containing outbreaks, as long as it remains non-airborne. Elsewhere....?

During this time the slope will decrease (slower rate of new cases), but it won't level out until all the regions of the world with lousy sanitation and living conditions are involved. There is simply nothing to stop the spread into and through those regions.

3. Eventually it'll drop down to a background level, having taken out as many victims as it can. Whether that's 50 million or a few billion, I can't begin to tell you. But I believe it'll be between those lower and upper limits.

13 posted on 09/15/2014 1:36:16 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever; dayglored
While the chart is interesting, the increase in the number of Ebola deaths will not continue at its current rate, but if it does, it means we are all dead two and a half years.

Yes. In two and a half years, we are all dead.

This is Captain Trips on steroids.

The virus is capable of boring through 12 inches of reinforced titanium plate.

22 posted on 09/15/2014 6:05:04 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson