Are you people high? Did you read the article? He was FOURTEEN and she was a 20 year old adult! And you think that child support should be awarded to a rapist?!
Well they should give him custody and let her pay the child support. But if he doesn't want custody, then he's still the father. The courts take the position that the child needs to be provided for. It's about the child not about him or her.
It was statuatory rape, but unless she forced him, it was still his decision, even if he was only 14.
The article is not clear. It says he initially ignored the request for child support and now owes penalties. But it also sounded like he was being forced to pay back child support for the period of time he didn’t even know he had a daughter.
He shouldn’t have to pay any child support for the period of time in which she didn’t even tell him he had a daughter.
~Are you people high? Did you read the article? He was FOURTEEN and she was a 20 year old adult! And you think that child support should be awarded to a rapist?!~
I know it is pretty much messed up situation but he is still a father and it is not a rapist but a child who is awarded support.
Nice to someone who READS the article!
“Are you people high? Did you read the article? He was FOURTEEN and she was a 20 year old adult! And you think that child support should be awarded to a rapist?!”
Are you saying that the father should not have to help support the kid?
Sounds kinda like Newt Gingrich........