[chessplayer]

"As he sees it now, she took advantage of a lonely kid going through a rough patch at home."

Oh, sure. NOW he saying he was "confused," AFTER the papers have been served. Back then he was probably bragging about it to everyone he could.

[2ndDivisionVet]

You’re just being a douche as a joke, right? Would you make the same statement if the victim of the rape was a young girl? And if not, why not? What’s the difference? So you really believe that a young boy who was raped should now be forced to pay child support?

[DannyTN]

Well as Dad said, "You screw up, it's your baby."

He should get a DNA test, and confirm it's his. But if it's his child, he should pay child support and have visitation rights.

[aft_lizard]

Your point? If this was a 14 year old girl you would be demanding the head of the 20 year old. You are right he probably did brag but what boy wouldnt? It does not make what happened right.

[gtwizard]

He should sue for FULL Custody! She is obviously an unfit mother, she is a child molester who raped an underage boy! Not to mention the fact that she hid the child from her rightful father! Goose/Gander I say!

[Morgana]

The woman is not in jail why?

[tumblindice]

Arizona is paying her, AFDC I suppose, and whatever other benefits she can claim, and they want reimbursement from the father. He’s the father.
But he was a minor and Arizona chose not to pursue her, even if he “failed to file charges”. Rape of a minor under a certain age is by statute a crime (”statutory rape”, sexual assault, whatever you want to call it) so the kid could argue that since the state let him down, by refusing to enforce AZ law, the state is barred.
If he didn’t waive a defense by ignoring legal notices. There’s enough stupid here for everybody to share blame.

[Veggie Todd]

And Whoopie says....

[AnotherUnixGeek]

Back then he was probably bragging about it to everyone he could.

Yeah, 14 year-olds say and do all kinds of dumb things. That's because they're children. Adults who have sex with 14 year-olds are pedophiles and criminals. The idea that one of these animals is now extracting money from the victim of her crime is depraved - she was the only adult involved in the sick decision which created her child and she should be the only person to suffer the consequences. What the hell is wrong with judges these days?

[nickcarraway]

Already posted here:Rape Victim Forced To Pay Child Support

[Rodamala]

This sounds as logical as Sharia Law rape judgements.

[MrB]

Well, of course the male is ALWAYS the rapist in any hetero-sex,

at least according to the feminazis.

[ro_dreaming]

“Thankfully, the money owed was determined to be due to the child, not the rapist.”

As I said in the other thread on this subject...

That’s not how it works. His child is six, so the money goes to her “parent” or “guardian”; which means the money goes to the woman who raped him, meaning the rapist.

She gets to spend it as she wants - on shoes, booze, drugs, or even clothes and toys for the child... but in my experience, not.

/bitter? you betcha