Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969
Honda reasons that this measure would aid law enforcement in taking out an active shooter, since the active shooter wouldn’t be able to obtain body armor.

Nor would his intended victims.
2 posted on 08/22/2014 8:56:51 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

Time to buy some is now.


3 posted on 08/22/2014 8:57:50 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Yea he wouldn’t be able to get body armor just like people can’t get illegal drugs.
What’s next?
No armored vehicles?
No bullet proof glass?
Houses must be paper thin for convenience of SWAT?
And on and on.
Honestly I don’t think this law would even pass the Rational Basis test if challenged in court.
These clowns need to stop trying to control is by regulating inanimate objects and leave us the hell alone.
Any society is going to have crime and problems, but the government is more likely to make them worse than fixing them.


14 posted on 08/22/2014 9:06:41 AM PDT by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson