To: servo1969
Honda reasons that this measure would aid law enforcement in taking out an active shooter, since the active shooter wouldnt be able to obtain body armor.
Nor would his intended victims.
2 posted on
08/22/2014 8:56:51 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
To: cripplecreek
3 posted on
08/22/2014 8:57:50 AM PDT by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
To: cripplecreek
Yea he wouldn’t be able to get body armor just like people can’t get illegal drugs.
What’s next?
No armored vehicles?
No bullet proof glass?
Houses must be paper thin for convenience of SWAT?
And on and on.
Honestly I don’t think this law would even pass the Rational Basis test if challenged in court.
These clowns need to stop trying to control is by regulating inanimate objects and leave us the hell alone.
Any society is going to have crime and problems, but the government is more likely to make them worse than fixing them.
14 posted on
08/22/2014 9:06:41 AM PDT by
Clump
( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson