[Laissez-faire capitalist]

Polygraphs are routinely administered before a case goes to trail. Why wouldn’t the police or the prosecutor in Ferguson Missouri not want to do this?

What does the Parks firm have to do with this? I was unaware of them calling for this. I have yet to see any in the MSM reporting on this, nor have I seen any talking heads or pundits in the MSM talk about the possibility of this.

If you have any links to the Parks firm concerning this (thus proof to bolster your statement), I would sure like to see them.

[Defiant]

No one is required to submit to a polygraph. Police sometimes ask a suspect to take one to eliminate themselves as a suspect. It is not admissible in court, and is of no legal consequence except to law enforcement in conducting an investigation.

So this entire thread is an exercise in irrelevant hypothetical alternative reality role-playing.

[longtermmemmory]

Polygraphs are just a tool for intimidation not a real scientific inquiry. (see police are allowed to lie during interrogations)

Mentioning a polygraph during a trial is grounds for a mistrial. Parks and Crump have made multiple appearances on CNN FNC and MSNC fanning the race card flames and attempting to influence the potential jury. Crump was on the Kelly file saying the autopsy he ordered was ambiguous enough to PRESUME GUILT and demanded an arrest.

Remember these lawyers are ambulance chasers who settle cases not try them. They are license in FL not MO. I do not wish to give their website the hits.