To: Rusty0604
Any objective measurement with a minimum passing score is discriminatory by definition. They discriminate against those who can't pass. Because they are objectively measuring physical attributes regardless of sex they are not discriminating against women, just those not strong enough to do the job.
In my state there used to be a requirement for state police that they must be a minimum of 6' tall. This was waived for women and is in fact a clear case of discrimination.
20 posted on
08/01/2014 6:40:10 AM PDT by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: Durus
That is discrimination because there are a lot of guys under 6’.
To: Durus
My memory of the mid to late 1960s was that height requirements for cops, was the first to go.
It used to be that a cop would walk into a bar with his billy club and arrest a man alone, or with his partner.
31 posted on
08/01/2014 9:51:26 AM PDT by
ansel12
(LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
To: Durus
In my state there used to be a requirement for state police that they must be a minimum of 6' tall. This was waived for women and is in fact a clear case of discrimination. If you can't make the height, just claim to be transgendered, then you get preferential treatment.
35 posted on
08/01/2014 10:44:31 AM PDT by
itsahoot
(Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson