[RKV]

I actually have some knowledge on this topic because I have had genetic analysis done on my self. I also happen to follow the literature, and can tell you the state of the art changes over time. In this particular case the authors have hypothesized a common ancestor not found in the paleontological record. Unless and until you find physical evidence of this species you’re not selling me on the theory.

[papertyger]

I actually have some knowledge on this topic because I have had genetic analysis done on my self.

Which means you have an investment in the status quo, therefore some measure of confirmation bias..

In this particular case the authors have hypothesized a common ancestor not found in the paleontological record.

That's not what the article is predicated on.

Planck didn't pull his famous dictum from thin air.