To: familyop
As for me I am focused and nothing is to good for any that served rather they had two legs or four and especially those that came back with none.
So what part of that statement disrespects veterans? You do understand that most of these dogs saved many a soldiers life in combat? What would you do abandoned them? Maybe shoot them? Isn't the best thing, the fair thing, the American thing is to let them comeback with their soldier?
9 posted on
07/25/2014 12:11:13 PM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Kartographer
Men are not to be equated with dogs.
10 posted on
07/25/2014 12:34:51 PM PDT by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt.), National Guard, '89-' 96)
To: Kartographer
"So what part of that statement disrespects veterans?"
I didn't write anything about that statement being disrespectful to veterans in this thread, but since you brought it up here,...
12 posted on
07/25/2014 12:43:11 PM PDT by
familyop
To: Kartographer
I think you overeact and get defensive.
People responding are not saying to abuse the dog or ignore it. It just is not their top priority, though it may not be necessary to the discussion.
And it might help to stop copying everywhere that statement, which needs to be proofread and corrected. ;-)
23 posted on
07/26/2014 7:12:32 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson