Skip to comments.
No Country for Old Politics (How to Define the Right in a Left World)
traditionalRight ^
| 9/18/2013
| Paul Gottfried
Posted on 07/17/2014 10:46:53 AM PDT by mojito
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: ConservingFreedom
The right wing of the American Revolution saw itself as restoring traditional English rights of Americans. The left wing believed in universalism. I side with the Federalists like Washington over the Jacobin lovers.
21
posted on
07/22/2014 9:55:35 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: humblegunner
It’s not a blog. It’s an online magazine, with serious writers. It’s publishing platform is irrelevant.
22
posted on
07/22/2014 9:56:28 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: rmlew
Its not a blog. Proudly powered by WordPress
It's a blog.
To: rmlew
Doesn't sound like the essentialist Right has much to do with anything that could reasonably be called American conservatism: 'the US was founded in the eighteenth-century as a liberal republic and does not have what Burke called an ancient constitution similar to the one found in Europe. The social world that gave birth to classical conservatism was a lot more ancient or medieval than the society that American conservatives set out to defend.'The right wing of the American Revolution saw itself as restoring traditional English rights of Americans.
I agree - but I think they understood themselves to be accomplishing that end by means of creating a form of government that was new, albeit leaning on English common law and informed by history. If "American conservatism" means anything, it means conserving that then-new creation.
24
posted on
07/23/2014 6:30:17 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: mojito; humblegunner
reap the benefits of their work by having FR traffic directed to the site where their work was originally postedSee post #9 - JR, the owner of this site, is explicitly against excerpting for the purpose of driving hits to the original site. His house, his rules.
25
posted on
07/23/2014 6:38:46 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson