I support none of those things, but again, why not leave them up to individual state’s legislatures?
What does this have to with this thread, and why would a conservative want to find an excuse to support liberal candidates?
A city council candidate has a chance of someday being a Mayor and negotiating labor contracts, or a Governor, or a congressman, or a Senator or a presidential candidate.
Which state should decide federal policy on abortion, and gay marriage, and the homosexual agenda, and other “social issues” at the federal level, in immigration, federal employment and benefits, the military, federal hospitals and medical facilities, and in foreign policy, etc?
Should we nominate Senators, Presidential candidates, and congressmen who were social liberals locally, to make those laws and decisions and policy at the federal level?