Oops
1 posted on
07/04/2014 10:52:46 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
As the tech improves we’ll find more planets we don’t see now and not see the ones that don’t exist.
2 posted on
07/04/2014 10:56:55 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: BenLurkin
Even if they existed and were habitable what’s the point of making such of a big deal about it when we have no means of getting there?
3 posted on
07/04/2014 10:58:38 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: BenLurkin
Well the consensus was that they were there. The issue was settled.
I dont like this anti-science behavior. Not at all!
4 posted on
07/04/2014 11:03:53 AM PDT by
VanDeKoik
To: BenLurkin
Personally I'm not sure any of them would be terribly habitable. If it exists Gliese 581d slips in and out of the habitable zone.
5 posted on
07/04/2014 11:07:38 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: BenLurkin
Fare thee well Gleise 581d, we hardly knew ye.
To: BenLurkin
Two potentially habitable planets in the Gliese 581 system
are just false signals arising out of starstuff, a new study said
Tell that to the endangered indigenous species suffering from the effects of the Gliesel warming .....
8 posted on
07/04/2014 11:16:44 AM PDT by
mikrofon
(Happy Independence Day)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson