Skip to comments.
The 8 Best Lines From Ginsburg's Dissent on the Hobby Lobby Contraception Decision
Mother (F) Jones ^
| 6-30-2014
| Dana Liebelson
Posted on 06/30/2014 9:14:15 AM PDT by Citizen Zed
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
Ginsburg and the wise latino et al are the ones wrecking havoc on society.
41
posted on
06/30/2014 9:44:24 AM PDT
by
Ray76
(True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
To: apillar
save the money and e-mail it to them and tell them to print it and use for TP.
No sense wasting your own ink/toner and paper.
42
posted on
06/30/2014 9:48:13 AM PDT
by
cableguymn
(It's time for a second political party.)
To: Citizen Zed
The very idea that women are somehow denied access to contraception unless big government is paying for it or making others pay is ludicrous. What about the millions of federal dollars being paid to Planned Parenthood ...doesn't PP hand out condoms and BC pills like popcorn to any woman who walks in the door? I see just about every pharmacy has the abortion pill, Plan B, displayed in plain sight and available without prescription to any female without any question about her age. It is easier for a young girl under 16 to get Plan B than to get her ears pierced or tattooed. Condoms are available not only in pharmacies but even grocery stores, Wal Marts, gas station convenience stores not to mention being handed out free on college campuses and high schools. Young girls barely into puberty can buy condoms or a month's BC pills for less than the cost of a latte at Starbucks and get an abortion without parental permission for less than the cost of her cell phone. To say that Puritanical Conservatives would deny women access to contraception without big daddy government's intervention is a flat out lie.
To: MrB
ignorant or lying(Ginsburg calling methods of abortion "contraception")
How about Satanic? People who think that way do not recognize abortion as murder
44
posted on
06/30/2014 9:50:27 AM PDT
by
grania
To: Kickass Conservative
sorry to hear about your troubles but I do have a question..
O-care does not force them to pay for it?
45
posted on
06/30/2014 9:50:56 AM PDT
by
cableguymn
(It's time for a second political party.)
To: Citizen Zed
"Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be 'perceived as favoring one religion over another,' the very 'risk the [Constitution's] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude." Simple solution: get the government OUT health care coverage, medical decisions, and individual funding of their care. It should never have put its camel's nose there in the first place.
46
posted on
06/30/2014 9:52:55 AM PDT
by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Citizen Zed
“It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a months full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage.”
Hobby Lobby chooses not to cover “abortificant's.” An IUD is NOT an abortificant. I'll go out on a limb and guess that IUDs are covered by Hobby Lobby's insurance plan.
47
posted on
06/30/2014 9:55:19 AM PDT
by
Rides_A_Red_Horse
(Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
To: Citizen Zed
The most disturbing part IMO, as was the case with some of the recent 2d A holdings, this was a 5/4 decision. It would seem we are on the brink in several major regards.
48
posted on
06/30/2014 9:57:39 AM PDT
by
frog in a pot
(We are all in the same pot.)
To: Citizen Zed
“The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would...deny legions of women who do not hold their employers beliefs access to contraceptive coverage.”
LEGIONS? Seriously, legions? How many pro-choice women are going to choose to work with Hobby Lobby or any other ‘closely held’ company that is so open, firm and clear in its guiding Christian beliefs?
49
posted on
06/30/2014 9:58:02 AM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: Khan Noonian Singh
“The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”
Yeah, it needs to get back to solid stuff like “emanations” and “penumbras”
50
posted on
06/30/2014 9:58:29 AM PDT
by
Ouchthatonehurt
("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: Citizen Zed
please let this old buzzard survive long enough to outlive Obama’s terms in office
51
posted on
06/30/2014 9:59:55 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Palin/Cruz 2016)
To: CaptainK
I thought abortion was in there, in the health insurance. It isn’t? I’d be surprised. I know he said we wouldn’t have to pay for abortions but I never believe what he says.
52
posted on
06/30/2014 10:04:30 AM PDT
by
hulagirl
(Mother Theresa was right)
To: RegulatorCountry
53
posted on
06/30/2014 10:06:45 AM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: RegulatorCountry; Citizen Zed
Exactly, RC.
BTW, This is how it was supposed to print. I had a misplaced carat which eliminated a paragraph:
"Would the exemption
extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah's Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]".
I have a solution. Let people chose the medical treatments they want, and pay for it themselves..
How rad is that?
54
posted on
06/30/2014 10:07:13 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Here's a LOL-icious joke about women." - "That's not funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!")
To: Citizen Zed
Today’s decision doesn’t change anything. Ginsburg’s apocalyptic visions would have already come true already.
55
posted on
06/30/2014 10:08:04 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Citizen Zed
Her arguments are really very plausible, sensible and convincing IF, and ONLY IF you consider pregnancy to be a disease and abortion the remedy.
Then she correlates this with certain religious groups that are against the use of bovine substitutes or blood transfusions.
In other words, and this is really way out there considering this lady is supposedly very smart, she’s saying that if I’m a Jehovah’s Witness, and own a business then I shouldn’t have to provide medical insurance for employees needing a blood transfusion?
Can someone please explain to me how the two are similar?
To: RegulatorCountry
Employers are entitled to not offer healthcare benefits at all, so theyre certainly entitled to place any restrictions or limits upon what they are or are not willing to offer, regardless of motivation. Employers can decline to offer it, just as a prospective employee is entitled to decline an offer of employment, should such restrictions or limitations be problematic for them, due to their own religious beliefs or motivations. Its exchanging labor for compensation. Compensation can take many forms.You should be on the Court, but they long ago left common sense behind.
57
posted on
06/30/2014 10:10:16 AM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: Citizen Zed
>"It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a months full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage."
Any more doubts that if you add 1 or 2 more of her this is gonna become the Social Justice Court?
To: wac3rd
And if we have a republican congress then the 50 vote majority rules now with regard to judicial appointments. No?
To: Political Junkie Too
“How can the Founders believe that they were securing Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness for our unborn future if they were also writing abortion into the Constitution?”
The pro kill your baby folks believe they know for certain the unborn they choose to kill would have chosen death themselves rather than to be born into the care of those killing them pre-birth. Kind of a self criticism the left imposes on themselves as the promiscuous subjects of the realm.
60
posted on
06/30/2014 10:21:57 AM PDT
by
Blue Collar Christian
(There's only one reason for authorities to take the arms of good people.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson