Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“But a circling charged object would emit radiation and lose energy. Over time its orbit would get smaller and smaller. Eventually it would crash into the nucleus.”

I think the key, as you said, is that the electron really isn’t “orbiting” the nucleus, in the classical sense. We just think about it that way because it’s easier for us to conceive than what is really going on. The electrons form standing waves, so they are oscillating in place, rather than moving through the field, so there is no induction. I think what we see as the electron’s position is just the most prominent node of the wave at that particular time.

The particles in the nucleus are standing waves also, and this is the reason that we see quantization, because waves can only form stable arrangements with each other based on the laws of harmonics, so you end up with only rational values being feasible.


45 posted on 06/24/2014 4:15:46 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
There was a fellow in Texas that came up with a theory that the electron was actually a toroidal sheet of charge surrounding the nuclei. According to his calculations the toroidal charge sheet could rotate without emitting radiation and so could remain in a stable orbit.

I haven't kept up to see if this is still a going theory. It would be interesting if it turned out he was right, but that physicists resisted his theory because the math would be too difficult to work with. After all, points are easier to model than toroidal sheets.

49 posted on 06/24/2014 4:52:25 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson