Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86
What accounts for the difference?

Try this: Medicare patients who have been paying into the system for decades are getting fewer services and far, far higher copays. Trending now and I can only hope that Medicare will be there for me if I should ever need it.

If you know anyone approaching Medicare age, urge them to have every single thing that might possibly go wrong in the next thirty years fixed NOW before they have to rely on the shrinking-daily Medicare benefits.

9 posted on 06/23/2014 12:58:08 PM PDT by Veto! (OpInions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Veto!
Try this:

But why would changes to Medicare affect Texas and Washington so differently? Medicare is a federal program.

10 posted on 06/23/2014 1:10:10 PM PDT by steve86 ( Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

I’m 46, but this sort of scenario is what scares me to death:

I get to be 70 or so and need knee/ hip replacements. (My father needed both hips replaced in his mid 60s, fairly early, so my concern is stronger due to family history.) By that time, in the 2030s, Medicare will be so depleted — notwithstanding my having “paid in” for nearly 50 years — that I will be told, “Although hip replacement is indeed ‘indicated,’ you are too old to justify the cost. Sorry; if only you were in your 40s or younger, it would be a better ‘investment.’ We have a nice walker and a bottle of ibuprofen for you.”


17 posted on 06/23/2014 1:41:35 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson