The scientific community too often doesn't investigate new ideas before disputing them. They are quick to ridicule new ideas without even attempting to scientifically prove them false.
And the dogma and "just so" stories that comes out of evolutionist camps is another major embarrassment to real scientists.
>>And the dogma and “just so” stories that comes out of evolutionist camps is another major embarrassment to real scientists.<<
If you can scientifically refute evolution, you will be the first to ever do so.
I can nail AGW using the Scientific Method with my little finger (scientific alternative addresses all know facts — the Earth has undergone broad climate changes which include changes of No2 since its birth).
If you have a physical scientific (not theological/philosophical) alternative that explains the billions of data points that cross multiple disciplines (physics/geology/cosmology/archaeology) let’s see it. The world will be your oyster.