We've seen with global warming the political influence on science. And the willingness of too many scientists to get on board and promote global warming without criticallly examining the data.
>>We’ve seen with global warming the political influence on science. And the willingness of too many scientists to get on board and promote global warming without criticallly examining the data.<<
Sadly, yes. Science will follow the money, especially when it is impossible to gauge the results (unlike, say Cold Fusion, which has to demonstrably work).
AGW is a very very new field of study and defies any and all scientific fundamentals — it meets exactly zero of the criteria of a Scientific Theory.
The tiny but growing AGW corner of “science” is like the tiny corner of business that is made up of government-subsidized “green” businesses.
I assure you AGW is an embarrassment to real scientists everywhere, especially since it gets thrown in the face of those who do pursue real science.