Sorry. Didn’t know I was dealing with a literal nit picker. (Are you also a spelling/grammar Nazi in your spare time?) Let me rephrase for you. All the evidence that conformed to what they wanted the American people to believe was released. Anything that would implicate anyone in power or didn’t conform, wasn’t. Just like the cover up going on about Benghazi and the video. Look it up for yourself. It’s not difficult.
“So, again, you can’t have it both ways. If they’re all lies, why would the Feds keep some secret?”
Why does the Obama administration lie and hide information? Surely you can figure it out.
I’m a horrible speller and only call mistakes out when the poster makes claims of superior intelligence while butchering the language in the process.
That being said, I’d hardly characterize the point as “nitpicking.” It’s typical of conspiracy buffs. If a piece of evidence provided by the government supports a conspiracy theory it’s accepted as real. Or if it’s withheld from the public then it also supports a conspiracy theory. If evidence doesn’t support a conspiracy theory, well, it can’t be trusted because it’s from the government. The same logic permeates the 911 truther community, the landing on moon was faked crowd, etc.