Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Theoria

It would have to be recent, wouldn’t it?

It it were chest high today (as seen on photo), how do you account for tree growth over the past decades, not to mention century?

If it were carved 100-200 years ago, would it not be a lot higher up on the tree, as it grew?


10 posted on 04/16/2014 8:04:41 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PGR88

No, it would stay the same height. The growth around the carving would determine the age. Like I said, that tree is not that old and I said the carving is about 40 to 50 years old..if that.


12 posted on 04/16/2014 8:09:37 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

BTW, If they leave that tree up, it will most likely blow down or break off at that carving since it is weak there now. That tree is now out in the open with nothing around to shelter it from the wind.


13 posted on 04/16/2014 8:11:44 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88
No. That would depend on the tree. You can see examples of famous Basque carvings in the West[dated].

NW injun arborglyph's have been covered pretty well.


15 posted on 04/16/2014 8:24:27 PM PDT by Theoria (End Socialism : No more GOP and Dem candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: PGR88

Trees get taller at the top, not the bottom. The shoot apical meristem is way up above the face and getting farther.


27 posted on 06/24/2015 3:44:48 PM PDT by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson