Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
I'm wondering how you can post this with a straight face! ... "and those qualities have been determined experimentally to not be present."

First, you won't even read a new way of approaching the issues, a way that has been around in proposition since Maxwell's quaternian equations. And you certainly cannot be up to date on propositions of an 'aether' if you aren't even familiar with the theory of ZPE (even Feynman affirmed it). So how is it that you can make or choose to make such sweeping assertions, from such a limited information position?

BTW, any patents applied for utilizing anything approaching a tap into the zpe has been classified by the Government 'in the interest of national security'. Which of course protects the oil and gas monopoly that runs our planet.

I would direct you to the source of that assertion regarding patents, but since you're not interested I won't. You have a Steven Jones scent to you.

49 posted on 04/07/2014 12:14:15 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

kerping


50 posted on 04/07/2014 12:15:38 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

“I’m wondering how you can post this with a straight face! ... “and those qualities have been determined experimentally to not be present.””

Because it’s true. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. If there is an ether that transmits a push force, it needs to have qualities allowing it to do so, and we have experimentally verified that an ether with those qualities doesn’t exist. You can propose another ether, but without those qualities, it can’t account for gravity.

“First, you won’t even read a new way of approaching the issues, a way that has been around in proposition since Maxwell’s quaternian equations.”

I read your summary and explained to you that something being theoretically possible according to the mathematics is not the same as being physically possible. You previously talked about there being a “proof” of these ideas you are advocating, but that is a mathematical concept, not a physical one. In physics, a mathematical proof is just the first step. If experimental verification is not forthcoming, then that proof is worthless.

“I would direct you to the source of that assertion regarding patents, but since you’re not interested I won’t.”

Yes, please spare me. I’m still waiting for you to provide any experimental verification of the ideas you are advocating. Until you can come up with that, don’t bother sending me anything else.


52 posted on 04/07/2014 12:41:07 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson