Having taught grammar for quite a few years, I'm wondering where there's a grammar weakness . . . maybe "that" for "who"?
Having taught grammar for quite a few years, I'm wondering where there's a grammar weakness . . . maybe "that" for "who"?
How about the Times didn't get the punctuation correct:
We have a weak and indecisive president; that invites aggression."
I can't believe that I am supporting Lindsey. How embarrassing.
Maybe the writer was "alerted" to a grammar "issue" (advised of a word substitution) by MS-Word or some other processor as he was spell checking his article.