You sure misread the motivations of the thread poster, then you are idiot enough to claim conservatives wouldn't vote for Reagan.
Read post 46, it will do you some good.
I guess that I prefer to allow enough thoughts in to keep thinking alive. I have seen many decide to start trashing a very good and solid conservative because of some rumor/misstatement in the MSM, or other "unacceptable behavior". Not long ago, many were spouting that Scott walker was unclean because he made some statement that they equated to amnesty. When folks become rabid 9calling others an idiot for instance), then they have become akin to the low-info voters that the Dim Party relies on. trouble is, we can never get any kind of consensus or sense of when we have to actually stick together to defeat an Obama. Our tactics suck and many decide it's time to punish the GOPe/RNC which means insuring the farthest left commie available gets elected. Then we moan because we have no conservatives to vote for. If we don't take any little improvement we can get, we will never build a base to ensure we get more conservatives. They also fail to distinguish the difference between a Romney and an Obama for the "big" election.
I read the post 46 and agree with it. I also notice that Innovative seems to have been "bumped". I find post 51 to be a little weird in that it calls JR "the boss". That would indicate that nobody can ever question/suggest something that he disagrees with or they get what we're fighting against in our own government. Kind of ironic how folks will "distinguish" in that way - similar to those who think the Constitution has their own personal "Noble Cause" clause and will support very un-Constitutional ideas if they seem like they would help the conservative side of the aisle.