Skip to comments.
Panty Protest: Kazakhstan Women Outraged by Lace Underwear Ban
NBC ^
| 2/17/14
| Alexander Smith
Posted on 02/17/2014 7:02:42 AM PST by workerbee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: workerbee
In Soviet Kazakhstan, panties line you.
To: grobdriver
I would also guess there are no Victoria’s Secret stores in Kazakhstan.
22
posted on
02/17/2014 7:40:26 AM PST
by
xp38
To: Tenacious 1
Of course, it’s a silly law that takes away individual choice. I’m sure glad the US doesn’t have any of those.
23
posted on
02/17/2014 7:43:08 AM PST
by
grania
To: workerbee
I'm outraged for them.
24
posted on
02/17/2014 8:03:04 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Tenacious 1
Cotton vs. polyester? Silk Vs. Lycra? Paper Vs. Plastic? Is it legal for their woman to "not where panties at all"? How do they calculate the resulting "absorption rate" of that? The proposed regulation doesn't ban wearing, it bans selling. No new hygienic certificate for such pants anymore, and selling ungergarments without one is a misdemeanour punished with a fine.
The absorbtion is measured in a lab when a producer/importer provides a sample. The method, I guess, is weighting the sample before and after moisturizing it.
To: workerbee
"...legislation - which includes provisions covering the required level of moisture absorption in the garments...." If Congress can dictate what toilets and light bulbs we can use why not regulate panties as well.
To: workerbee
next thing you know, they will be compothing a patriotic thong about this ithue.
To: SoothingDave
The scary thing is that if they’re throwing those numbers around, they clearly already have a bureaucracy that is dedicated to running around and measuring moisture inside womens’ panties.
To: Buckeye McFrog
I served in that bureaucracy — or at least a spontaneous college chapter — but that was before I met my wife ...
29
posted on
02/17/2014 9:13:56 AM PST
by
IronJack
To: GreyFriar
Another example of totalitarianism.
30
posted on
02/17/2014 9:16:03 AM PST
by
zot
To: left that other site
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner! Please exit the thread in a orderly fashion ...
31
posted on
02/17/2014 9:46:54 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(The future is not going to take us seriously.)
To: Tax-chick
To: Lazamataz
33
posted on
02/17/2014 10:29:53 AM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: SoothingDave
34
posted on
02/17/2014 11:33:35 AM PST
by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
To: Buckeye McFrog
35
posted on
02/17/2014 11:37:00 AM PST
by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
To: a fool in paradise
I have noticed a lack of attention to men’s undies...boxers or briefs....question.
36
posted on
02/17/2014 11:49:35 AM PST
by
Conservative4Ever
(waiting for my Magic 8 ball to give me an answer)
To: Conservative4Ever; Revolting cat!
I have noticed a lack of attention to men’s undies...boxers or briefs....question. Don't ask, don't tell!
37
posted on
02/17/2014 3:20:44 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
To: The Great RJ
If Congress can dictate what toilets and light bulbs we can use why not regulate panties as well."You made a BINGO!"
38
posted on
02/17/2014 3:23:10 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson