Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/12/2014 3:43:14 PM PST by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Total energy input still far higher than output
***Seems like a typo to me.


2 posted on 02/12/2014 3:44:19 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

“Fusion power would avoid the need for long-term storage of radioactive waste. And unlike fossil fuels like coal, it would not produce greenhouse gases that cause global warming.”

BUT!

It DOES PRODUCE ENERGY, which is what the envirowhackos and the Population Control crowd REALLY HATE.

The “pollution” and “warming” memes are just scare tactics, to hide their true agenda.


3 posted on 02/12/2014 3:45:09 PM PST by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Break even? Hosrefeathers. What was the energy cost of isolating tritium and deuterium?


8 posted on 02/12/2014 3:55:50 PM PST by rsobin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

BE/A curve says there is energy in them there atoms. Interesting that laser technology appears to be leading the way.


25 posted on 02/12/2014 7:04:30 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Let the free market decide. If either method has promise (scientifically and economically) I’m sure one of the oil companies or some other deep-pocketed concern will take notice and either buy or replicate the process. Until then it’s all unicorns.


28 posted on 02/13/2014 3:58:20 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson