To: editor-surveyor
What gets me is where are they seeing these human footprints? The only thing that slightly resembles a footprint is the one to the right of the Canon lens cap, but that could be anything. A freakin' rock could have made that.
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Those are KEDS tracks!
We used to make the same footprints in the mud back in the 60’s!
Funny thing though... I don’t think they had KEDS back, say, ohh, 800,000 years ago! These are SHOE prints if anything.
Scientists, schmientists...
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
You’re correct,there is nothing about it other than its outline that has any of the characteristics of a foot print.
.
17 posted on
02/08/2014 11:25:05 AM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Oh now that’s as clear as mud.
22 posted on
02/08/2014 2:56:05 PM PST by
SgtHooper
(If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
What gets me is where are they seeing these human footprints? The only thing that slightly resembles a footprint is the one to the right of the Canon lens cap, but that could be anything. A freakin' rock could have made that. That's what I was thinking. Where are any indentations for the toes or heel, or were they wearing bedroom slippers?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson