[rktman]

Methinks Lord Monckton has delivered a kick to the co-crown holders jewels. LOL! Thank goodness this asshat and rfk jr. never had kids together.

[Texas Fossil]

Yes, I really enjoyed the letter from Lord Monckton:

Monckton: Challenge to Prince Charles (Over Global Warming Debate)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3119765/posts

Posted from “Watts Up With That” as mentioned in the American Thinker article.

[yldstrk]

I remember Diana, Princess of Wales, (stuff it “royal family”) told Chuckie to quit talking to plants or “people would think he was barking...” lol!

[Texas Fossil]

Lord Monckton has been a champion for the Tea Party, he is a science adviser to the Queen, he has a low opinion of Prince Charles’s ability to govern England effectively.

PC’s actions on this simply reinforce that judgement. Many have speculated that eventually the Queen will decide he is unfit for the job and possible let his son assume the office.

[TomGuy]

Option 1: give up any claim to the throne.

Option 2: a 2-hour debate to be televised internationally.

I bet option 2 would be much better and more interesting than the faux debate between Kerry and Gingrich on the subject of climate change/global warming/global cooling.

==

I bet Her Majesty cringes every time the Prince opens his mouth in public.

[LegendHasIt]

Oh, Man, I love this. Always thought Lord Viscount Monckton was one of the great voices of sanity in the Gorebal Warming debate, but this communication to Prince Chuckles is worthy of Mark Steyn.

[Chode]

OH Woe is me... why's everybody always pickin on me???

[onyx]

He’s an idiot when it comes to Global Warming and he should immediately drop that nonsense, but it’s my understanding that Prince Charles is otherwise a conservative.

[loveliberty2]

Moncton's letter might remind one of Burke's 1775 "Speech on Conciliation. . ." which, when delivered to the British Parliament, on some points, might have been seen as both impertinent and challenging.

[jmacusa]

Inbreeding has consequences. It’s pretty much a given that Prince Charley is a blithering idiot.

[omega4412]

Whatever the supermarket tabloid headlines say, wouldn't changing the succession require an act of Parliament? Actually acts of Parliaments -- UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.

Up Chuck!

[Sherman Logan]

Those remarks were rankly party-political

That is of course the whole problem. Those holding Charles' view on this subject believe the issue is settled and so beyond party politics. It's like claiming belief in or opposition to the law of gravity is a party politics issue.

In fact, most liberals believe that all liberal views are not partisan political issues, they're just the way all decent people think. Only positions opposing them are considered partisan in nature.

This POV is, for most of them, entirely genuine. They really believe it.

[SMARTY]

If the future king thinks he can feather his nest by pandering to the Liberal elements in Great Britain.... he may be in for a cold shower.