Hope this helps:
This is from the thread article:
” - - - LifeNews.com Note: Jill Stanek fought to stop “live birth abortions” after witnessing one as an RN at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Illinois. That led to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act legislation, signed by President Bush, that would ensure that proper medical care be given to unborn children who survive botched abortion attempts. - - - “
As you can see, even her bio is disjointed.
IMHO, the author is:
* writing with high emotion
* skipping important connecting thoughts
* relying on hotlinks, images, and code phrases to fill out her article
* assuming that we agree with all that she has written.
Summary: Not a good article “to read in front of a writing class.”
Thank you. I would have had to click through to the article and risked all the downloads, spamware, malware, and whatever else + pursued much of the website in order to know what was being said.
IMHO, the author is:
* writing with high emotion
****I don’t mind that as long as the author makes sense.
* skipping important connecting thoughts
***The key missing ingredient. Even someone with a prolife tagline doesn’t know WTF she’s saying.
* relying on hotlinks, images, and code phrases to fill out her article
***Unfortunate. She has something important to say and it’s lost in all that.
* assuming that we agree with all that she has written.
****It sounds like I agree on the vast majority of what she writes, and yet she can’t connect. That’s a tragedy.
Summary: Not a good article “to read in front of a writing class.”
***Sad. Very Sad. If Girl Scouts catch me this year, maybe I’ll ask them if they have heard of this author before I buy a box of overpriced mint cookies.