Posted on 01/27/2014 2:03:55 PM PST by Theoria
The answer is no, just as we don’t hear a peep from them on tobacco laws, even recent ones signed by Obama at the federal level.
Why is NPR ignoring that the federal government can only regulate intrastate activity when the states delegate appropriate powers to the feds, via the Constitution, to do so? Concerning alcoholic beverages, this is evidenced by the 18th Amendment which was later repealed by the 21st Amendment.
With the exception of the federal entities indicated in the Constitution's Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I, note that the Supreme Court has officially clarifed related issues which reflect that Congress has no constitutional authority to regulate the issue addressed by this thread.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State (emphasis added), and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress. (emphases added)” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824."From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited. None to regulate agricultural production is given, and therefore legislation by Congress for that purpose is forbidden (emphasis added)." --United States v. Butler, 1936.
I suspect that a lot of state lawmakers who agree with the federal laws on this issue don't understand that the feds currently have no constitutional authority from the states to make laws concerning such things.
That'd just about get my ex through February. It IS a short month.
Whiskey Rebellion started on this very ground where I sit, 1791.
And the Feds STILL haven’t won it.
“How do home beer brewers and winemakers get away with it?”
Jimmy Carter created the exemption for homebrewers, but it didn’t apply to distilling alcohol.
Varies by state, some say 200. That might make it to march for him.
But by what right can the [federal] government require permits/tax?
Ask John Roberts - its the taxation power.
I don’t know the economics of home hootch. Can you personally drink enough to recoup the costs? Will it taste as good as Jack Daniels? What’s the market (legal or illegal) for home grown booze?
actually, it’s a her.
Internet postings indicate you can make decent vodka for 5 bucks a gallon in materials.
But I think you’d have to knock back a lot of booze to really have any significant savings if you include capital and labor costs.
I’d view it as more of an insurance policy for SHTF situations.
Neither beer nor wine are distilled spirits and for the record its not illegal to make moonshine at home...
its Illegal to make moonshine at home without the gub'ment issued license and then you get to pay a tax so your stuff is legal.
The problem is that to be in compliance with all the rules and regs to get a license to do so takes lots of cash!
It’s a matter of alcohol content in the final product.
Besides, the wine and beer you make at home must not be up for sale.
The Constitution does not empower the Congress to legislate you. Is the criminal charge manufacturing alcohol or is the charge tax evasion?
I am probably late on this thread but perhaps someone can clear this up for me.
I believe that at one time an individual could manufacture up to 200 gallons of alcohol each year for their own family consumption without incurring a tax.
I have no other details. Does anyone know the facts?
So the distinction is between brewed and fermented spirits versus distilled spirits?
The repeal of prohibition has nothing to do with this. Making moonshine is not illegal. It is the failure to pay the taxes on producing moonshine that is illegal. And the Constitutional authority for that is Article 1, section 8, clause 1.
The way I understood it was that so long as it was personal consumption it was fine. Try to sell it and that is illegal. I assume it’s okay to give it away however.
Article I, section 8, clause 1: "The Congress shall have the Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises..."
Made around 100 gallons back in ‘89. Came out 110 proof and cost about $1.50 per quart to produce. Drank it as fast as we made it. Sure glad livers regenerate.
I’m not sure, but that’s what I have heard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.