Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman
I have absolutely no trouble with people having to make choices. Why should a person get a government subsidy and not pay it back? These people won't lose their assets for being on Medicare, they'll lose them for having Medicare pay their bills.

After all, it isn't really accumulated wealth unless one has paid their bills along the way.

12 posted on 01/27/2014 8:37:21 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grania

I agree with you but the same principle should apply to wall street welfare crowd.


13 posted on 01/27/2014 8:43:45 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: grania

I think you mean medicaid”-that is what the masses think is “free” to everyone with no or little income, and obamacare has expanded that definition.


15 posted on 01/27/2014 8:46:54 AM PST by Texan5 (" You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: grania

they don’t go after medicare, but they do medicaid (welfare medical care).


28 posted on 01/27/2014 9:08:39 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: grania

Medicare and Medicaid are different. Medicaid is a pure wealth transfer program. Medicaid patients have done nothing but exist and get sick. Medicare patients usually have paid into Medicare for decades.


48 posted on 01/27/2014 10:11:08 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson