To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
one dimensional = nanotube (technically 3D, but still)
two dimensional = graphene
Three dimensional = ?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Missed the first paragraph:
**********************************************
The discovery of what is essentially a 3D version of graphene – the 2D sheets of carbon through which electrons race at many times the speed at which they move through silicon – promises exciting new things to come for the high-tech industry, including much faster transistors and far more compact storage devices.
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Salo; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; Still Thinking; ...
6 posted on
01/23/2014 10:03:04 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is frustrating as supposed scientists plainly ignore a dimension for headline grabbing press. Graphene and nano tubes both have three dimensions. It doesn't matter that one dimension is small.
10 posted on
01/23/2014 10:43:44 AM PST by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Haven't seen you for a while Ernest.
Glad to see you back.
21 posted on
01/23/2014 6:46:47 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(Grovelnator Shwarzenkaiser: fasionable fascism one charade at a time.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
