Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

I do not disagree. My sole argument is that a religion does not cease to be a religion because it has strongly negative aspects, or is mixed in with what we more commonly think of as political or cultural issues.

I don’t have to like a religion for it to be a religion. There is no rule out there that requires religions to all be cute, cuddly and loving.

Which is pretty much my point. We really ought to think about how we should deal with religions that are bad and negative. Classifying all religions as innocuous and “good” prevents us from doing so.

Here’s Merriam-Webster definition:

: the belief in a god or in a group of gods

: an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods

: an interest, a belief, or an activity that is very important to a person or group

Nothing there that requires goodness or non-violence. And all quite obviously apply as much to Islam as to Christianity or any other religion. Indeed, many sects of Buddhism would not meet the first definition.


25 posted on 01/21/2014 7:01:26 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

There’s still the difference between religion and cult. Size matters not.


26 posted on 01/21/2014 7:04:28 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson