Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Makes Order To Investigate Obama’s Social Security Number
The Patriot ^ | 1/12/2014 | The Patriot

Posted on 01/13/2014 5:33:39 PM PST by Jayster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: jaydee770

....”Here’s an important question: What are you or anyone else going to do about it?”....

Obviously anything we attempt does nothing but give our politicians press face time and is as far as it goes.

Those with enough power who could DO something don’t want to...and that’s where we are!


61 posted on 01/14/2014 12:20:00 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I do think that’s how his followers see him....they live in fairy tale land anyway, so it’s a true reflection IMO....


62 posted on 01/14/2014 12:42:27 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
Judge Makes Order To Investigate Obama’s Social Security Number

Judge Hollander ordered no such thing. The author makes the boneheaded mistake of relying on Orly's press release rather than reading the actual order.

After Orly filed her amended complaint, the SSA replied to her FOIA request, stating it could locate no responsive records relating to the "042" SS# and a person named "Bounel" born in 1890. Normally, in a FOIA case, such a reply makes the underlying case moot. But Taitz resisted the SSA's Motion for Summary Judgment in the case, complaining that the SSA did no do an adequate search. Judge Hollander told Taitz, in effect, "you can't raise that issue in your motion papers; you can only do it in your pleadings (i.e., by amending your Complaint).

So the Judge is allowing Orly the chance to claim the SSA performed an inadequate search. No doubt the SSA will respond with a renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, this time including a more detailed affidavit of its search methodology. Taitz will object, but she will have no basis upon which to challenge the search.

The case will then be tossed out (again).

But there is no order involving some "investigation" of the SSA records involving Obama.

63 posted on 01/14/2014 1:48:04 PM PST by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww
Those with enough power who could DO something don’t want to...and that’s where we are!
It is disheartening at times, but things are looking up. The next election cycle may be a bit of a help!
64 posted on 01/14/2014 7:10:05 PM PST by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jaydee770

I’m a realist pretty much, so after these past couple elections I get the drift that it’s likely already in the bag who wins the Presidency...

On the other hand the primaries are another story. But even then by the time we get there with our guys they’ll be a host of picking up to do to say it lightly...and that will surely be opposed.


65 posted on 01/14/2014 7:40:21 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

My guess is Taitz will miss the deadline. She always has a way to screw things up. That said, at least she is trying. Meanwhile this will be played out for a few years until it is totally irrelevant.
Sheriff Joe had a big announcement planned last year. It was cancelled with no mention of any type. Now people are posting he has another announcement planned for March 2014. No going to happen.


66 posted on 01/15/2014 4:40:50 AM PST by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
Taitz actually filed her Second Amended Complaint on time. But the SSA has twice told Taitz, in effect, that she's going down the wrong path trying to link the "O42" SS# to someone name "Bounel." Taitz will try again. Taitz will lose again.

As to the CCP, one may notice Arpaio has been largely absent from the scene since before the 2012 election. That an Internet radio preacher has become more of a spokesperson for the CCP "investigation" than Arpaio should be enough to signal that something is seriously amiss about the whole endeavor.

67 posted on 01/15/2014 8:47:40 AM PST by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
It was the general consensus that had Nixon not resigned he would have been impeached by the house. take a breath you really are worked up over an apology to another poster

I was just pointing out that I, and MANY others do not think that congress would have voted to impeach....the charges were no where near serious enough to justify impeachment

68 posted on 01/15/2014 2:44:56 PM PST by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

It doesn’t matter what you thought…. impeachment is always about politics and at the time the house was more than happy to impeach Nixon.


69 posted on 01/15/2014 4:00:10 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

yes, this seems to be re-reported from December news events.

Taitz was supposed to have amended by now, and awaiting
further developments from the judge.


70 posted on 01/15/2014 5:10:46 PM PST by urtax$@work (The only kind of memorial is a Burning memorial !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

WIKI-short and pertinent bio of Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander:

In April 2009, Hollander wrote to Senators Barbara Mikulski and Benjamin Cardin expressing interest in her nomination to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland with respect to an anticipated vacancy. In June 2009, she submitted a written application to the merit selection committee composed of members of the Maryland Bar Association. She interviewed with the committee and became one of the persons on the short list of candidates submitted to the Senators. She was recommended by Cardin and Mikulski to President Barack Obama in December 2009.[1]

Hollander was formally nominated on April 21, 2010,...


71 posted on 01/15/2014 5:19:44 PM PST by urtax$@work (The only kind of memorial is a Burning memorial !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson